(Bloomberg) — U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez and his spouse don't need jurors of their upcoming corruption trial to study concerning the energy couple's lavish way of life, which included cigarettes, purses and jewellery.
Bloomberg's Most Learn
Legal professionals for Menendez and his spouse, Nadine, objected Friday to prosecutors making an attempt to supply such proof in federal court docket in New York, the place they’re accused of accepting bribes of money, gold bars and a automobile in trade for political favors to 3 businessmen.
Jurors shouldn’t be informed about her “choice for costly luxurious gadgets,” together with her choice for Bombay Sapphire gin, cigars and unique meals on a restricted wage, and her purses and jewellery whereas needing a Mercedes-Benz, in line with separate paperwork from the couple's attorneys.
“There is no such thing as a yacht or trip house that was draining Senator Menendez's funds,” the New Jersey Democrat's legal professionals wrote within the submitting. “He lived nicely inside his means as an worker of the federal authorities.”
Menendez's legal professionals ridiculed prosecutors for making an attempt to categorise extraordinary purchases as luxurious gadgets.
$23.99 Gin
Nothing a few bottle of Bombay Sapphire gin, which sells for $23.99, “smells extreme,” they stated.
However in Friday's flurry of filings, prosecutors additionally included new particulars about their investigation of Menendez's relationship with a medical testing firm that employed his spouse. The decide had beforehand stated the corporate's proprietor was “an alleged beneficiary of the bribery scheme,” in line with a doc.
The brand new paperwork recognized the corporate and its proprietor, neither of whom have been charged with a criminal offense and usually are not named within the indictment.
Robert Menendez is accused of crimes together with bribery, fraud, extortion, obstruction and appearing as a overseas agent of Egypt. His spouse has additionally been charged together with two businessmen. All of them pleaded not responsible. A 3rd businessman pleaded responsible and is cooperating with prosecutors.
Menendez, 70, has seen his reputation decline since he was first impeached in September and resigned as chairman of the Senate International Relations Committee.
Protection attorneys responded to a letter from prosecutors by saying the federal government needed to current the proof to indicate the couple's motive or as a result of it’s “inextricably intertwined” with the fees. However protection attorneys say it will unfairly prejudice the couple in a trial set to start Might 6.
“Proof of a prison defendant's particular purchases or possessions that the federal government touts as 'lavish' or 'lavish' is especially pernicious in stirring up feelings within the jury,” the attorneys wrote in certainly one of a number of paperwork filed late within the day. night.
Within the 2021 trial of Theranos Inc. founder Elizabeth Holmes, prosecutors had been allowed to current some proof of her urge for food for fame and fortune as a motive. She was convicted of defrauding traders and sentenced to simply over 11 years in jail.
Probably the most explosive proof towards Menendez contains gold bars and about $500,000 in money seized from the couple's house. In a submitting, her attorneys stated prosecutors will probably “attempt to inundate the jury with references to money, gold bars, jewellery and different gadgets of worth allegedly seized from Menendez's house.”
Prosecutors ought to restrict themselves to presenting just one envelope of money that allegedly contained the fingerprints of Fred Daibes, an actual property developer charged together with Menendez, in line with the submitting. Protection attorneys stated in addition they won’t problem proof of gold bars or house furnishings that Daibes allegedly offered.
“However aside from an envelope with some money allegedly bearing Daibes' fingerprint, there isn’t a proof linking the remainder of the money or jewellery seized from the senator's house to any alleged co-conspirators,” in line with The doc.
'Money at house'
Prosecutors stated in a doc that Menendez notified the federal government that he might request using an skilled “in connection along with his alleged causes for preserving money in his house.” In that case, prosecutors will object.
A defiant Menendez stated on September 25 – days after his first indictment – that he frequently withdrew money from his private accounts for “emergencies.” He cited his household's historical past in Cuba, which he feared the federal government would confiscate his cash, as the rationale he appreciated to maintain money.
Prosecutors may attempt to current proof New Jersey firm that performs Covid-19 testing, Fusion Diagnostics Inc., gave “valuables” to Menendez and his spouse, in line with a March 29 authorities letter that the Menendez's legal professionals appeared in court docket on Friday.
These issues of worth included “family providers and items, in trade for Robert Menendez appearing on Fusion's behalf, together with making an attempt to affect municipal officers in a number of New Jersey cities to grant Fusion contracts and/or different authorizations to carry out Covid-19 checks.” the letter stated.
U.S. District Choose Sidney Stein additionally stated in a March four ruling that Fusion's proprietor was among the many “alleged beneficiaries of the bribery scheme,” in line with the letter.
Fusion proprietor Moataz Abdalla didn’t reply to requests for remark despatched via his firm and its LinkedIn web page.
A submitting by Nadine Menendez's attorneys stated authorities filings present Abdalla “knowledgeable legislation enforcement brokers that he employed Ms. Menendez to do advertising work for Fusion” and denied it was due to her relationship with the senator.
“Mr. Abdalla has additionally denied that Senator Menéndez made calls on his or Fusion's behalf,” in line with the doc.
The couple's attorneys oppose using Fusion's proof at trial. His attorneys stated Fusion's proof “will not be 'inextricably intertwined' with the charged crimes, neither is it essential to 'full the story'” of the alleged crimes.
Learn extra: US Senator Bob Menéndez is charged once more in a US bribery case
Nadine Menendez's attorneys from the legislation agency Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears additionally notified the decide that they had been withdrawing from the case. It was not instantly clear who will characterize her at trial subsequent month.
The case is United States v. Menendez, 23-cr-490, United States District Courtroom, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
(Updates with particulars on new displays)
Most Learn Bloomberg Businessweek
©2024 Bloomberg LP