UAB Blazers (22-11, 15-5 AAC) vs. Memphis Tigers (28-5, 18-2 AAC)
Fort Price, Texas; Sunday, 15:15 EDT
Betmgm SportsBook Line: Tigers -Four.5; over/beneath is 160.5
The underside line: No. 16 Memphis and Uab play for the AAC championship.
Tigers are 18-2 in opposition to AAC opponents and 10-Three in non-conference sport. Memphis ranks sixth in AAC with 23.6 defensive restoration per match led by PJ Haggerty on common Four.6.
Blazers are 15-5 within the AAC sport. UAB is Three-Three in single possession video games.
Memphis enrolls 80.zero factors per match, with Four.zero extra factors than 76.zero UAB stop. UAB on common 6.6 made Three-mayors per match this season, with 1.Four fewer photographs on common than eight.zero per sport that Memphis has given up.
Groups meet for the third time this season. The tigers gained 88-81 within the final match on March 2. Haggerty led her on tigers with 25 factors, and Ja’borri McGhee led him to Blazers with 22 factors.
High Performers: Haggerty marks 21.eight factors per match with 5.7 restoration and three.eight tiger assistants. Dain Dainja has a mean of 18.5 factors, eight.Four restoration and 1.7 blocks within the final 10 video games.
Yaxel Lendborg has a mean of 17.7 factors, 10.eight restoration, Four.2 assistants, 1.7 thefts and 1.eight blocks for blazers. Tyren Moore has a mean of 1.5 made Three factors within the final 10 video games.
Final 10 video games: Tigers: 9-1, with a mean of 82.5 factors, 38.6 restoration, 16.2 assistants, 7.9 thefts and 5.7 blocks per match whereas taking pictures 46.1% on the sector. Their opponents recorded a mean of 74.Four factors per match.
Blazers: 7-Three, with a mean of 80.eight factors, 34.7 restoration, 16.zero assistants, 6.Four thefts and 5.zero blocks per match whereas taking pictures 45.Three% of the sector. Their opponents recorded a mean of 77.1 factors.
___
Related Press created this story utilizing the expertise provided by Information Skrive and information from Sportradar.