One Nation Champions Coal and Nuclear Power Ahead of Victoria's Election

In a bold move, One Nation has unveiled its energy strategy for Victoria, advocating for the continuation of coal-fired power and the lifting of the nuclear ban as the state approaches its November election. The announcement was made at the Loy Yang power station in Gippsland, a facility that is scheduled to cease operations by 2035.

Party leader Pauline Hanson and state leader Warren Pickering emphasized their commitment to keeping Loy Yang A operational, despite the looming closure date. Pickering attributed the decline of coal power to unfavorable government policies that, he argues, have discouraged proper maintenance of such plants. However, he acknowledged that discussions with Loy Yang's owner regarding the financial implications of extending the plant's life had not yet taken place.

One Nation's energy policy also includes plans to repeal Victoria's long-standing nuclear energy ban instituted in 1983. According to Pickering, Victorians should have access to next-generation nuclear technology, including thorium micro-reactors. He pointed out that the party's vision aligns with federal ambitions for a nuclear facility along the eastern coastline, potentially benefiting the state.

As the election nears, voters will encounter starkly different energy proposals, with One Nation and the Coalition criticizing the Labor government’s initiatives on renewable energy. Additionally, One Nation has committed to dismantling renewable energy zones in western Victoria and halting the state's net-zero emissions goal.

Experts have raised concerns regarding the feasibility of One Nation's plans. Grattan Institute’s Tony Wood warned that the aging coal infrastructure could lead to reliability issues and increased costs, suggesting that merely investing more funds would not suffice to maintain operational efficiency. Furthermore, he noted that the high costs associated with nuclear power construction deter potential investors.

Victoria University's Bruce Mountain downplayed the significance of removing renewable energy zones, suggesting that they are merely administrative labels without guaranteed benefits for renewable production.

Source: www.abc.net.au